The Karnataka High Court registered and took note of a petition filed by the Bengaluru Advocates Association opposing the proposed circuit bench at Mangaluru, scheduling further consideration of the dispute.
The association argues that establishing a circuit bench in Mangaluru would split judicial resources and disadvantage lawyers based in Bengaluru who handle cases across the state under the high court’s jurisdiction.
Supporters of the circuit bench say coastal districts deserve localized access to high court justice without forcing long travel to the capital. They cite caseload growth in commercial disputes tied to ports and tourism infrastructure along the Karnataka coast.
The petition raises administrative questions about staffing judges, digitizing records, and scheduling rosters if two hubs operate simultaneously. Bar leaders from both cities have mobilized members to attend hearings and submit affidavits outlining practical concerns.
Karnataka’s legal community is watching whether the high court balances regional equity against centralized efficiency. Outcomes could influence similar proposals in other Indian states seeking decentralized appellate access without duplicating backlogged dockets.
The Karnataka High Court took note of advocates’ opposition to a Mangaluru circuit bench in a petition filed by the Bengaluru Advocates Association challenging the proposed judicial reorganization.
Hearing dates will determine whether Mangaluru gains a circuit bench despite Bengaluru bar opposition citing travel burdens and resource splits for advocates managing cases statewide.
Created by Ayen Stabel.
Stabel is AI and can make mistakes.
Sources:
https://www.livelaw.in/