Ayen News

Author: news.ayen.in

  • Police Visit BJD MLA’s Residence in Case Involving Husband

    BHUBANESWAR (Sunday, March 29, 2026) — A team of police officers from Kalahandi district visited the official Bhubaneswar residence of Manorama Mohanty, the sitting Biju Janata Dal (BJD) MLA from Narla, in connection with a criminal case registered against her husband, Durga Prasad Mohanty. The husband, who also serves as the Narla Block Chairperson, is accused of issuing death threats to a government official.

    Background of the Case

    The investigation stems from a formal complaint filed earlier this month by Bibhu Prasad Singh, the Tehsildar of Narla.

    • The Incident: On March 15, 2026, Durga Prasad Mohanty allegedly used abusive language and issued a death threat to the Tehsildar during an official phone conversation while the officer was performing his duties.
    • The Charges: An FIR was subsequently registered at the Narla Police Station under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), including:
      • Section 296: Obscene acts and songs (using abusive language).
      • Section 221: Obstructing a public servant in discharge of public functions.
      • Section 351(2) & 351(3): Criminal intimidation and threatening to cause death or grievous hurt.

    Sunday’s Police Action

    The Kalahandi police team, supported by local personnel from Bhubaneswar, arrived at the MLA’s quarters around 8:30 AM on Sunday.

    • Serving Notice: The Kalahandi Superintendent of Police clarified that the visit was primarily intended to serve a legal notice, as the accused has reportedly been “absconding” since the case was registered.
    • Outcome: Neither the MLA nor her husband was present at the residence during the visit. Police conducted a brief search and examined some documents before leaving.
    • Prior Attempts: Sources indicate that police had previously traced Mohanty to a hotel in the state capital, but he reportedly managed to evade capture with the assistance of supporters.

    [Image: Map of Odisha showing the distance between Narla (Kalahandi) and Bhubaneswar (the capital where the MLA resides)]

    Political Fallout: “Vendetta” Allegations

    The BJD leadership has reacted strongly to the police visit, framing it as an act of political intimidation by the ruling BJP.

    PartyStanceKey Argument
    BJDPolitical VendettaBiju Yuva Janata Dal (BYJD) president Chinmaya Sahu alleged that the raid was retaliation because Manorama Mohanty did not cross-vote for the BJP candidate in the recent Rajya Sabha elections.
    PoliceRoutine ProcedureOfficials maintain the investigation is strictly administrative, following a direct complaint from a state government official (Tehsildar).

    Sources

    • Odisha TV (OTV): “Narla BJD MLA’s husband accused of issuing death threats to Tehsildar, FIR lodged” (March 29, 2026).
    • Press Trust of India (PTI): “Police visit BJD MLA’s residence in connection with case registered against husband” (March 29, 2026).
    • Pragativadi: “Narla MLA’s Husband Faces Probe After Death Threat Allegation” (March 29, 2026).
    • Odisha Bytes: “Police Visit Odisha MLA’s Bhubaneswar Residence In Probe Against Husband” (March 29, 2026).

  • Police visit BJD MLA’s residence in connection with case registered against husband

    BHUBANESWAR: (Mar 29) A police team visited the official residence of a sitting BJD MLA, Manorama Mohanty, here on Sunday in connection with a case registered against her husband.

    A team of police officers from Kalahandi district, early on Sunday, reached the residence of the Narla MLA here. Manorama’s husband is the Narla block president of BJD.

    The police have registered a case against the husband of MLA for allegedly threatening the tehsildar, a police officer said on Sunday.

  • 20 Arrested in Solan After Brutal Group Attack on Three Men

    SHIMLA (Sunday, March 29, 2026) — Police in Himachal Pradesh’s Solan district have arrested 20 individuals following a violent clash that left three young men seriously injured. the attack, which involved sharp-edged weapons, occurred on Saturday near a girls’ school and is believed to be the fallout of a long-standing personal dispute.

    The Incident: A Daylight Ambush

    According to the First Information Report (FIR) lodged at the Solan City Police Station, the violence erupted when a group of approximately 20 to 25 men intercepted the victims.

    • The Confrontation: An eyewitness reported that the group surrounded his cousin near the local girls’ school. A heated argument quickly escalated into a physical assault.
    • The Weaponry: The attackers allegedly used sharp-edged weapons and blunt objects to inflict deep wounds on the victims before fleeing the scene.
    • The Victims: * Harsh (23): A resident of Ward Number 7, Solan.
      • Lalit Kishore (23): Originally from Sirmaur district.
      • Lalit Kumar (26): A resident of Bano village.

    [Image: Map of Solan district highlighting the sensitive zones near educational institutions where police patrolling has been increased]

    Police Action and Investigation

    Superintendent of Police (Solan) confirmed that a massive search operation was launched immediately after the victims were rushed to the regional hospital.

    StatusDetails
    Arrests20 individuals apprehended as of Sunday morning.
    Primary ChargesSections related to Attempt to Murder, Rioting, and Unlawful Assembly under the BNS.
    MotivePreliminary probe suggests an ongoing personal dispute between two local factions.
    RecoverySeveral weapons used in the offense have been seized for forensic examination.

    Community Impact

    The location of the attack—near a school—has sparked concerns regarding public safety in Solan. Local authorities have since increased “police presence” in the area to prevent any further retaliatory violence between the involved groups.

    Sources

    • The Tribune: “20 held for attacking three youths with sharp weapons in Solan” (March 29, 2026).
    • Press Trust of India (PTI): “Himachal: 20 arrested for attacking three men in Solan” (March 29, 2026).
    • Himachal News Service: “Solan Police crack down on gang violence; 20 in custody” (March 29, 2026).
    • Official Statement: Office of the Superintendent of Police, Solan District (March 29, 2026).

  • Radio-Collared Tigress Poisoned and Buried in Madhya Pradesh; 5 Arrested

    BHOPAL (Sunday, March 29, 2026) — Authorities in Madhya Pradesh have arrested five individuals following the retaliatory poisoning and burial of a radio-collared tigress near the Satpura Tiger Reserve (STR). The carcass of the big cat was recovered on Friday morning from a pit in the West Chhindwara forest division, concluding a search operation triggered by a lack of movement in the animal’s tracking data.

    Incident Timeline & Discovery

    The tigress, a four-and-a-half-year-old animal originally rehabilitated from the Bandhavgarh Tiger Reserve, had established territory in a human-dominated fringe area outside the protected reserve boundaries.

    • The Trigger: The investigation revealed that the tigress had recently killed an ox belonging to a local farmer in Chhatiaam village.
    • The Poisoning: In retaliation, the farmer, identified as Udesingh (50), allegedly laced the ox’s carcass with urea or pesticide. The tigress died after consuming the poisoned bait.
    • The Burial: To conceal the crime, Udesingh and four accomplices buried the tiger’s carcass in a pit and reportedly burnt its radio collar.
    • Recovery: A forest team, assisted by a dog squad, traced the scent from the ox carcass to a pit near Udesingh’s hut, where the tiger’s body was found at approximately 8:30 AM on Friday.

    Criminal Profile & Context

    Satpura Tiger Reserve Field Director Rakhi Nanda confirmed that the primary accused is also under investigation for illegal opium cultivation.

    DetailInformation
    Victim4.5-year-old female tiger (Translocated from Bandhavgarh).
    AccusedUdesingh (50) and four others; all remanded to judicial custody.
    Secondary CrimeIllegal opium cultivation on the accused’s farm.
    MotiveRetaliation for livestock loss and fear of forest officials discovering the opium farm.

    Allegations of Monitoring Failure

    Wildlife activist Ajay Dubey has filed a formal complaint with the National Tiger Conservation Authority (NTCA), alleging gross negligence. He claims the radio collar had been stationary since March 3, but no action was taken for over three weeks.

    • Forest Dept Defense: Field Director Rakhi Nanda stated that regular monitoring had been scaled back because the tigress had “well established” its territory. Officials assumed the collar might have been “dropped” remotely after receiving confirmation for its removal on March 19.
    • Mortality Trends: This incident marks the 14th tiger death in Madhya Pradesh since January 2026, highlighting the escalating human-wildlife friction as tiger populations expand into revenue lands.

    Sources

    • The Hindu: “Tiger poisoned to death near Satpura Reserve; five arrested” (March 29, 2026).
    • The New Indian Express: “Tiger poisoned to death near Satpura Reserve in MP, five held; accused also into opium cultivation” (March 28, 2026).
    • Indian Express: “Translocated Bandhavgarh tigress poisoned and buried in MP’s Chhindwara; five arrested” (March 29, 2026).
    • Times of India: “Collared tiger killed with poisoned bait in MP, 4 villagers arrested” (March 28, 2026).

  • Study Reveals Metformin Controls Blood Sugar via Brain Pathways

    NEW DELHI (Thursday, March 26, 2026) — A groundbreaking study published in the journal Science Advances has revealed that metformin, the world’s most widely prescribed diabetes medication, works by targeting a previously unknown pathway in the brain. For over 60 years, it was believed the drug acted solely on the liver and gut; however, this discovery identifies the brain as a “command center” for its glucose-lowering effects.

    The Discovery: The Rap1-Hypothalamus Axis

    Researchers at Baylor College of Medicine, led by Dr. Makoto Fukuda, identified a specific molecular “switch” in the brain that allows metformin to function at much lower doses than previously thought necessary.

    • The Target Region: The study focused on the ventromedial hypothalamus (VMH), a part of the brain responsible for sensing glucose and regulating satiety.
    • The Molecular Switch: A protein called Rap1 was found to be the key mediator. Metformin works by suppressing Rap1 activity in the VMH.
    • Neural Activation: When Rap1 is inhibited, it activates a specific group of brain cells called SF1 neurons, which then send signals to the rest of the body to lower blood sugar.

    Key Evidence from the Study

    The research team used genetically engineered models to prove that the brain is indispensable for metformin’s action.

    Experiment TypeMethodologyResult
    Genetic KnockoutMice were bred without the Rap1 protein in their brain’s VMH.Metformin failed to lower blood sugar, even though other drugs like insulin still worked.
    Direct Brain InjectionTiny doses of metformin were injected directly into the brains of diabetic mice.Blood sugar dropped significantly at doses thousands of times lower than typical oral doses.
    Sensitivity ComparisonCompared the brain’s response to the liver and gut’s response.The brain reacted to much lower concentrations, suggesting it is a primary site of action.

    Implications for the Future

    This shift in understanding opens new therapeutic doors for treating type 2 diabetes and potentially other neurological conditions.

    1. Targeted Therapies: Future drugs could be designed to target the VMH Rap1 pathway directly, potentially reducing the side effects (like gastrointestinal distress) associated with high oral doses of metformin.
    2. Anti-Aging Potential: Metformin is already widely studied for its geroprotective (anti-aging) benefits. Dr. Fukuda’s team plans to investigate if this same Rap1 signaling is responsible for the drug’s ability to slow brain aging and improve longevity.
    3. Refined Prescribing: Doctors can now better understand why low doses of metformin are effective for some patients, as the brain-based mechanism is highly sensitive.

    Sources

    • Science Advances: Lin et al., “Low-dose metformin requires brain Rap1 for its antidiabetic action” (Published March 2026).
    • Baylor College of Medicine News: “Researchers uncover a new player mediating metformin’s anti-diabetic action” (March 26, 2026).
    • The Week: “Diabetes drug’s 60-year mystery solved: Scientists finally discovered how metformin works” (March 26, 2026).

  • A new global analysis published in The Lancet Obstetrics, Gynaecology, and Women’s Health has highlighted a significant, though slowing, decline in maternal mortality worldwide. While the report acknowledges long-term progress, it places India among the countries with the highest absolute number of maternal deaths in 2023.

    Global Maternal Mortality Estimates (2023)

    The study, led by the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington, reveals a stark disparity in maternal health outcomes across South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa.

    CountryMaternal Deaths (Total)Comparison to Live Births
    Nigeria32,900Highest global total.
    India24,700Second highest global total.
    Ethiopia11,900High burden in Sub-Saharan Africa.
    Pakistan10,300High burden in South Asia.

    Correction on Ratio: It is important to distinguish between absolute deaths and the Maternal Mortality Ratio (MMR). While India saw 24,700 deaths in total, its MMR (deaths per 100,000 live births) has actually seen a steady decline. According to the Sample Registration System (SRS) and the latest UN-MMEIG reports (2025), India’s MMR has dropped to approximately 93 per lakh live births, down from 130 in 2014-16.

    Key Findings of the IHME Analysis

    The researchers noted that while maternal deaths have decreased significantly over the past three decades, the pace of improvement has stagnated in recent years.

    • Uneven Progress: Improvements are not uniform; while some regions have seen rapid declines due to better access to emergency obstetric care, others remain trapped by fragile health systems.
    • South Asia Context: India and Pakistan continue to account for a large portion of global maternal deaths primarily due to their large population sizes and high birth rates, despite improving ratios.
    • Stagnation Drivers: Factors such as climate change, regional conflicts, and the long-term impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on routine prenatal services have contributed to the slowing progress.

    India’s Progress vs. The Global Burden

    Despite the high absolute number of deaths, the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare points to India as a “top performer” in reducing the rate of mortality:

    • 86% Decline: India has reduced its MMR by 86% over the last 33 years (1990–2023), outpacing the global average reduction of 48%.
    • SDG Targets: India is currently on track to achieve the Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) target of an MMR below 70 per lakh live births by 2030.

    Sources

    • The Lancet Obstetrics, Gynaecology, and Women’s Health: “Global, regional, and national estimates of maternal mortality, 1990–2023” (Published March 2026).
    • Press Information Bureau (PIB): “India witnesses a steady downward trend in maternal and child mortality” (April 7, 2025).
    • Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME): “Maternal Mortality Trends and Country Estimates” (Updated 2026).
    • UN Maternal Mortality Estimation Inter-agency Group (UN-MMEIG): “2000-2023 Report” (Published April 2025).

  • De-prescribing Preventive Drugs in Frail Elderly Not Linked to Higher Mortality

    NEW DELHI (Friday, March 27, 2026) — A collaborative global analysis has found that stopping “preventive” medications in frail, older adults does not increase the risk of death, hospitalization, or major cardiovascular events. The findings, published in the journal BMC Geriatrics, challenge the long-held medical practice of maintaining lifelong preventive drug regimens for patients with limited life expectancy or high frailty.

    The Study: Re-evaluating Polypharmacy

    The research was conducted by an international team, including experts from the ICMR-National Institute for Research in Bacterial Infections (Kolkata) and Sweden’s Karolinska Institutet. They analyzed multiple studies to determine if “de-prescribing”—the planned process of reducing or stopping medications—led to adverse health outcomes.

    • Target Group: Older adults (typically 65+) classified as “frail” or having multiple chronic conditions.
    • Medications Studied: Primary preventive drugs such as statins (for cholesterol), antihypertensives (for blood pressure), and bisphosphonates (for bone density).
    • Key Findings: * No significant increase in mortality or hospitalization rates.
      • No rise in Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE).
      • No increased risk of falls or fractures, which are leading causes of disability in seniors.
      • No recorded reduction in the quality of life.

    [Image: Infographic showing the “De-prescribing Process”: Review > Identify > Prioritize > Plan > Monitor]

    Why “De-prescribing” Matters

    As patients age, the benefit-to-risk ratio of certain preventive drugs shifts. What was beneficial at age 50 may become a burden at age 85.

    FactorRisk of Over-Medication (Polypharmacy)
    Adverse Drug ReactionsOlder metabolism processes drugs slower, leading to higher toxicity risk.
    Drug InteractionsTaking 5+ medications significantly increases the chance of harmful interactions.
    Physical HazardsCertain BP meds can cause dizziness, leading to falls and hip fractures.
    Treatment BurdenThe mental and financial stress of managing dozens of daily pills.

    A Note on “Low Evidence Certainty”

    Despite the encouraging results, the researchers issued a caveat. The “evidence certainty”—the statistical confidence that the research perfectly reflects reality—was rated as low.

    • The Need for Trials: Most existing data comes from observational studies rather than large-scale Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs).
    • Clinical Judgment: Experts emphasize that de-prescribing should never be done by the patient alone; it must be a supervised clinical decision tailored to the individual’s specific health status and goals.

    Sources

    • BMC Geriatrics: “Effect of de-prescribing preventive medications on mortality and health outcomes in frail older adults: A systematic review” (Published March 2026).
    • Press Trust of India (PTI): “Stopping preventive drugs in elderly not linked to mortality, hospitalisation: Analysis” (March 27, 2026).
    • Karolinska Institutet Press: “New research questions lifelong preventive medication for the frail elderly” (March 26, 2026).
    • ICMR Bulletin: “Geriatric Health Update: De-prescribing Protocols” (March 2026).

  • AIIMS Delhi Surgeons Successfully Remove 21.8 kg Uterine Sarcoma in Rare Feat

    NEW DELHI (Friday, March 27, 2026) — Surgeons at AIIMS Delhi’s Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital (Dr. BRA-IRCH) have successfully performed a high-risk operation to remove a massive 21.8 kg uterine sarcoma tumor from a 46-year-old woman. The tumor, which filled the patient’s entire abdominal and pelvic cavities, is one of the largest of its kind ever recorded in Indian medical history.

    The Patient: A High-Risk Case

    The 46-year-old Delhi resident presented with a rapidly deteriorating condition that had progressed over four months.

    • Symptoms: Progressive abdominal fullness, severe distension, and intense pain that eventually led to significant functional limitations.
    • Comorbidities: The patient was recently diagnosed with diabetes and hypertension, complicating the anesthesia and surgical recovery process.
    • Clinical Surprise: Despite the immense pressure on her internal organs, she reported no bowel or bladder issues, which is unusual for a mass of this magnitude.

    The Surgery: Precision Under Pressure

    The operation was led by Dr. M.D. Ray, Professor in the Department of Surgical Oncology. The surgical team faced immense challenges due to the tumor’s size and its proximity to vital organs.

    Surgical ChallengeMedical Response
    Tumor Weight21.8 kg (Filling abdomen and pelvis).
    Organ CompressionThe mass pushed the diaphragm and major blood vessels (Aorta/IVC).
    Vascular RiskPotential for massive blood loss during the detachment of the uterine wall.
    Operation TimeSeveral hours of meticulously separating the mass from the intestines and bladder.

    Understanding Uterine Sarcoma

    Uterine sarcoma is a rare, aggressive form of cancer that forms in the muscles or supporting tissues of the uterus.

    • Difference from Fibroids: Unlike common non-cancerous fibroids, sarcomas grow rapidly and can spread to other parts of the body.
    • Detection: Large sarcomas are often mistaken for simple bloating or weight gain until they reach a size that causes severe physical distress.
    • Treatment: Surgical removal (Hysterectomy) remains the primary treatment, often followed by radiation or chemotherapy depending on the “grade” of the tumor.

    Post-Operative Recovery

    The patient is currently stable and under close observation at Dr. BRA-IRCH. Dr. Ray noted that the successful removal of such a “gigantic mass” without damaging the surrounding organs is a testament to the advanced surgical oncology capabilities at AIIMS.

    Sources

    • The Hindu: “AIIMS Delhi surgeons remove 21.8 kg uterine sarcoma tumour in high-risk operation” (March 27, 2026).
    • Press Trust of India (PTI): “Rare 21.8 kg tumor removed from 46-year-old woman at AIIMS Delhi” (March 27, 2026).
    • Times of India: “AIIMS Delhi: Massive 21 kg uterine sarcoma removed in record surgery” (March 27, 2026).
    • Official AIIMS Bulletin: “Department of Surgical Oncology Achievement Report” (March 2026).

  • National Security Breach: NIA Custody of Seven Foreign Nationals Extended

    NEW DELHI (Friday, March 27, 2026) — A Special NIA Court has extended the custodial interrogation of seven foreign nationals—including six Ukrainian citizens and one U.S. national—by 10 days. The accused are allegedly involved in a high-stakes breach of India’s national security, a case the agency describes as having “global ramifications” and “extreme sensitivity.”

    Procedural Shift: Court Moves to NIA Headquarters

    In a rare move highlighting the gravity of the case, Special Judge Prashant Sharma allowed the National Investigation Agency (NIA) to conduct judicial proceedings within the agency’s heavily fortified headquarters in New Delhi rather than a public courtroom.

    • Security Rationale: The judge noted that the sensitivity of the investigation and the potential for international interference necessitated a high-security environment for the proceedings.
    • The Accused: The group consists of six Ukrainians and one citizen of the United States.
    • Production Deadline: Following the 10-day extension, the accused are scheduled to be produced before the court again on April 6, 2026.

    The Allegations: Breach of National Security

    While specific details remain classified under the Official Secrets Act (OSA) and the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA), NIA sources have hinted at several core areas of the probe:

    Investigation Focal PointDetails
    Data ExfiltrationAlleged unauthorized access to sensitive Indian defense or strategic databases.
    Espionage LinksInvestigation into whether the individuals were operating on behalf of a third-party intelligence agency.
    Global RamificationsThe NIA is reportedly coordinating with international agencies to trace the flow of encrypted communications used by the group.
    Logistical SupportIdentifying local Indian handlers who may have facilitated the foreigners’ entry or access to secure zones.

    Judicial Oversight and Custody

    The NIA argued that further custody was essential to confront the accused with newly recovered digital evidence and “voluminous” encrypted data retrieved from their personal devices.

    • Judicial Custody vs. NIA Custody: The extension allows investigators to keep the suspects in their direct interrogation facility rather than shifting them to a standard jail (judicial custody), where interrogation is restricted.
    • Legal Representation: The foreign nationals are being provided with legal aid, and respective embassies have reportedly been notified as per international diplomatic protocols.

    Sources

    • The Times of India: “National security breach: NIA custody of 7 foreign nationals extended by 10 days” (March 27, 2026).
    • Press Trust of India (PTI): “Delhi court allows NIA headquarters as venue for security breach case proceedings” (March 27, 2026).
    • Hindustan Times: “Six Ukrainians and one US national in NIA net over security breach; custody extended” (March 27, 2026).
    • Official NIA Briefing: Update on Case RC-04/2026/NIA/DLI (March 27, 2026)

  • Former Amethi Nagar Panchayat Chairperson Chandrama Devi Jailed in Fraud Case

    SULTANPUR, UP (Friday, March 27, 2026) — A local court in Sultanpur has remanded Chandrama Devi, the former chairperson of the Amethi Nagar Panchayat, to judicial custody in connection with a high-profile property fraud case. The court of in-charge District Judge Rakesh Pandey rejected her interim bail plea on Thursday and has scheduled the hearing for her regular bail application on March 30, 2026.

    The Case: Fraudulent Property Transfer

    The legal action stems from a complaint filed by Ghanshyam Soni, a local trade leader in Amethi.

    • The Allegation: Soni alleged that during her tenure as chairperson, Chandrama Devi fraudulently facilitated the transfer of his house to other individuals—identified as Lallu Prasad Soni, Lalji Soni, Pujari Lal Soni, and Sangam Lal Soni.
    • The Mechanism: The complainant claimed that a forged certificate was issued to enable the illegal transfer of the property records.
    • The Defense: Her counsel, Arvind Singh Raja, argued that such certificates are officially issued by the Executive Officer of the Nagar Panchayat, not the chairperson, asserting that Chandrama Devi has been falsely implicated due to political rivalry.

    Judicial Proceedings and Health Status

    Following directions from the High Court to surrender within a week, Chandrama Devi appeared before the court of ACJM Bhavya Srivastava on Thursday.

    EventDetail
    SurrenderThursday, March 26, 2026, at ACJM Court.
    Bail RejectionACJM court and later District Judge court rejected interim bail.
    HospitalizationAdmitted to the Sultanpur District Hospital late Thursday night due to reported illness.
    Next HearingMarch 30, 2026, for regular bail arguments.

    [Image: Timeline of the legal process from “Complaint Filed” to “Surrender” and “Judicial Custody”]

    Context: Political Undercurrents

    Chandrama Devi is a prominent figure in local politics, being the wife of Rajesh Agrahari (popularly known as Rajesh Masala), the current District Panchayat President of Amethi. The defense has repeatedly highlighted this connection to claim the case is politically motivated.

    Earlier in 2026, the court had issued a non-bailable warrant and a notice for property attachment (Kurki) against her after she missed several court appearances, leading to her eventual surrender this week.

    Sources

    • Hindustan Times: “Ex-chairperson of Amethi Nagar Panchayat sent to jail in fraud case” (March 27, 2026).
    • Navbharat Times: “धोखाधड़ी के मामले में अमेठी की पूर्व नगर पंचायत अध्यक्ष गईं जेल” (March 26, 2026).
    • Dainik Jagran: “Sultanpur News: Amethi’s former Nagar Panchayat President sent to jail” (March 26, 2026).