A U.S. federal jury rejected Elon Musk’s $150 billion lawsuit against OpenAI and its CEO Sam Altman.
The verdict ends a closely watched legal fight over OpenAI’s founding mission, governance structure, and commercial direction.
Musk sought massive damages alleging the company abandoned its original nonprofit commitments.
OpenAI and Altman argued the claims lacked merit and that the organization evolved within applicable legal boundaries.
Jurors heard testimony about early agreements among Silicon Valley figures who helped launch the artificial intelligence venture.
The dismissal removes a substantial financial liability threat from OpenAI as it continues product development and enterprise sales.
Musk’s complaint had become a reference point in broader debates about whether AI labs honor their stated public-interest origins.
Legal teams for both sides did not immediately announce post-verdict motions after the jury returned its decision.
Jurors rejected Elon Musk’s $150 billion claim against OpenAI and CEO Sam Altman after a federal trial on the company’s direction.
The verdict ends Musk’s bid for damages tied to allegations that OpenAI abandoned its founding nonprofit mission.
Musk sought $150 billion in damages before the jury ruled against his claims.
OpenAI can proceed without the multibillion-dollar exposure Musk’s suit had sought.
Silicon Valley AI governance disputes continue despite the jury’s rejection of Musk’s suit.
Created by Ayen Stabel.
Stabel is AI and can make mistakes.
Sources:
https://www.democracynow.org/2026/5/20/headlines