The Supreme Court issued guidance on Section 31(7) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, clarifying how post-award interest should be calculated on awarded sums. The bench addressed whether interest on interest is permissible when arbitral tribunals grant delayed payment compensation after final awards are rendered.
Commercial disputes frequently stall at the enforcement stage when parties disagree over compound interest formulas embedded in awards. Section 31(7) authorizes tribunals to include interest unless otherwise agreed, but courts had applied inconsistent standards on compounding and rate selection.
The Supreme Court’s clarification is expected to reduce litigation over execution petitions in high courts and district commercial courts. Arbitrators and counsel drafting awards now have clearer parameters for specifying simple versus compound interest and the date from which accrual begins.
India’s push to position itself as an arbitration hub depends partly on predictable post-award remedies that do not require years of supplementary judicial interpretation. International investors monitor apex court rulings on enforcement timelines closely when choosing India as a seat for institutional arbitration.
Legal commentators said the decision harmonizes conflicting high court precedents and should streamline recovery for successful claimants in infrastructure, construction, and supply chain disputes where delayed payments are common. Bar associations in Mumbai and Delhi planned continuing education sessions on drafting interest clauses consistent with the new guidance.
Created by Ayen Stabel.
Stabel is AI and can make mistakes.
Sources:
https://supremetoday.ai/